Update on Eudamed and its implications for vigilance in the EU

This will be a very short post, because everything I could write down on the subject is in the interview I had with Ashley Yeo of Scrip Regulatory Affairs, that kindly consented to publication of the article on my website, so here it is. It puts current and future vigilance initiaties, including the Eudamed database, in the perspective of the ongoing fall-out of the PIP scandal and contains some speculative predictive statements about where things are going.


Navigate through our knowledgebase

Related articles

Article

A case of so-called fiscal neutrality

Sometimes you come across cases that violate Mandalorian Creed: “One does not speak unless one knows.”. This happened to me last week when I read the Dutch Supreme Court’s judgment in a…

Read more

Article

Can we fix / improve the MDR and the IVDR?

Or in other words that I’ve asked on this blog before: can the maker repair what he makes? This blog will argue that he can and he should. It still happens to…

Read more

Article

MDR and IVDR amendment has entered into force now

Today is the day that the amendment, aka the ‘extension’, to the MDR enters into force because it was published in the EU’s Official Journal today, number L080. As you are reading this,…

Read more