Does EC40, a chlorhexidin lacquer to prevent tooth decay, qualify as a medicinal product or not?

The Dutch Minister of Healthcare decided that EC40, a lacquer containing chlorhexidin used for the purpose of preventing tooth decay, should be regarded as both a medicinal product by presentation as well as a medicinal product by function and imposed an administrative penalty of €12.000, since the company (Biodent) (i) prepared the product, (ii) had the product in stock and (iii) marketed it without a marketing authorisation. According to the information leaflet, EC40 ensures a “long-term suppression of the cariogenic mutant streptococcus on the treated teeth parts”. The highest administrative court of the Netherlands, the Council of State, aligns with the judgment of the District court that EC40 should be qualified as a medicinal product by presentation as well as a medicinal product by function. Please find the judgment and my annotation here (only in Dutch).


Navigate through our knowledgebase

Related articles

Article

A case of so-called fiscal neutrality

Sometimes you come across cases that violate Mandalorian Creed: “One does not speak unless one knows.”. This happened to me last week when I read the Dutch Supreme Court’s judgment in a…

Read more

Article

Can we fix / improve the MDR and the IVDR?

Or in other words that I’ve asked on this blog before: can the maker repair what he makes? This blog will argue that he can and he should. It still happens to…

Read more

Article

MDR and IVDR amendment has entered into force now

Today is the day that the amendment, aka the ‘extension’, to the MDR enters into force because it was published in the EU’s Official Journal today, number L080. As you are reading this,…

Read more